I think we all have to much time on our hands and probably to much money to be wasting on cars as wellOmniCognateSnr wrote: ↑Thu Oct 07, 2021 8:38 am100%. And to be clear, because I know I need to spell it out for the GTS frat boys (joking, you know who you are) I'm just saying the use of the word "better" is very subjective. There are plenty of reviews that say the Base model is all you'll ever need, or the S is the sweet post, or the GTS is the king of the hill and we all chose the one we feel proves we are right. Basically we all pick the model we like the most or best fits what we are prepared to spend on a car (or can afford). I "can" afford a GTS, my S is only about £2k short of the price of a GTS but for me the S is a "better fit" to my needs and, yes, budget. I can get a lot of extras in that price that make the car more suitable for me, and the GTS comes with a lot of things I absolutely don't want. So its better for me, but not a better car (if you see what I mean). I would never say the S I have ordered is "better" than a base, it just fits my needs better.sd1985 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 07, 2021 6:11 amI dont think we will ever agree on thisOmniCognateSnr wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 10:16 pm
I still think the word “better” needs to be use with care. If you aren’t interested in a v6 engine then the base Macan is “better” for you out of the 3 cars. If you want something thats fast, comfy and well specced ( and, lets not forget, has last years GTS engine) then the S may be a “better” car for you. If your focus is performance then….well, you get the idea.
So, to be clear, I am arguing semantics not automotive design, and clearly have too much time on my hands. Anyway, pretty sure I've done that to death now.
1st world problems eh