After following some discussions here about the relative popularity of the different models I put the following table together showing the actual UK registrations for the various models using data from the howmanyleft.co.uk site.
Interesting takeaways:
GTS share was consistently around 20% when it was available.
Turbo (and Turbo Performance) share was consistently around 9%
S and Base slugged it out for the remaining share, varying by years
Macan UK Registrations 2017 to 2020
- SmallWheels
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2020 3:20 pm
2020 Macan S: http://www.porsche-code.com/PLWMC5M3
2019 BMW i3S (for local trips and Mrs Smallwheels)
2019 BMW i3S (for local trips and Mrs Smallwheels)
Thanks for posting this info. It's surprising how well sales held up during 2020 with all the disruption due to the pandemic. Total sales never fully recovered from the withdrawal of the SD.
Peter
Current: 2020 Carmine Red GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PMST9ZI9
Gone- 2015 Sapphire Blue Diesel
Gone -2013 Cayenne Diesel
Current: 2020 Carmine Red GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PMST9ZI9
Gone- 2015 Sapphire Blue Diesel
Gone -2013 Cayenne Diesel
I'm surprised by the 48% share for the base in 2018 - i could understand the removal of the diesel version perhaps pushing people towards the 2.0T for the supposed lower running costs, but that seems awfully high and is not yet reflected in the advertised cars for sale currently (OPC or non OPC). Maybe they built up stock/dedicated more production to the base so people bought for a shorter lead time ?
- Wing Commander
- Posts: 19914
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
It was definitely the (much) shorter lead time on the 2.0 compared to the S or the SD that prompted me to buy a 2.0 in 2016, when it replaced my company car.Percymon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:20 am I'm surprised by the 48% share for the base in 2018 - i could understand the removal of the diesel version perhaps pushing people towards the 2.0T for the supposed lower running costs, but that seems awfully high and is not yet reflected in the advertised cars for sale currently (OPC or non OPC). Maybe they built up stock/dedicated more production to the base so people bought for a shorter lead time ?
Simon
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
I can even remember one of your early posts saying the 2.0 had enough power for anyone's needsWing Commander wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:29 am
It was definitely the (much) shorter lead time on the 2.0 compared to the S or the SD that prompted me to buy a 2.0 in 2016, when it replaced my company car.
Peter
Current: 2020 Carmine Red GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PMST9ZI9
Gone- 2015 Sapphire Blue Diesel
Gone -2013 Cayenne Diesel
Current: 2020 Carmine Red GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PMST9ZI9
Gone- 2015 Sapphire Blue Diesel
Gone -2013 Cayenne Diesel
The 2.0 does have enough power for anyones needs. Peoples desires however is a different thing....On-Track wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:58 amI can even remember one of your early posts saying the 2.0 had enough power for anyone's needsWing Commander wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:29 am
It was definitely the (much) shorter lead time on the 2.0 compared to the S or the SD that prompted me to buy a 2.0 in 2016, when it replaced my company car.
- Wing Commander
- Posts: 19914
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
On-Track wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:58 amI can even remember one of your early posts saying the 2.0 had enough power for anyone's needsWing Commander wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:29 am
It was definitely the (much) shorter lead time on the 2.0 compared to the S or the SD that prompted me to buy a 2.0 in 2016, when it replaced my company car.
Yes, when certain people were bashing the humble 2.0, probably.
Now I’ve got a 480+bhp motor that devours turbos!
Simon
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Quite possibly because Porsche launched the facelift in 2018 on the base only, the S only became available about 6 months later.Percymon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:20 am I'm surprised by the 48% share for the base in 2018 - i could understand the removal of the diesel version perhaps pushing people towards the 2.0T for the supposed lower running costs, but that seems awfully high and is not yet reflected in the advertised cars for sale currently (OPC or non OPC). Maybe they built up stock/dedicated more production to the base so people bought for a shorter lead time ?
I know because I got my wife a 2018 base in volcano
You could not order a facelift S until early December with deliveries late March 2019 onwards. Whereas the 2.0 litres were configurable from about September with 1st deliveries about a month later. The last gen1 deliveries would have been about Augustsd1985 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:35 pmQuite possibly because Porsche launched the facelift in 2018 on the base only, the S only became available about 6 months later.Percymon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:20 am I'm surprised by the 48% share for the base in 2018 - i could understand the removal of the diesel version perhaps pushing people towards the 2.0T for the supposed lower running costs, but that seems awfully high and is not yet reflected in the advertised cars for sale currently (OPC or non OPC). Maybe they built up stock/dedicated more production to the base so people bought for a shorter lead time ?
I know because I got my wife a 2018 base in volcano
2019 Macan S Porsche code PKW8WKI8
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post